Gays in Denial
Though nothing in science or morality recognizes any credibility in homosexuality, gays cling hysterically to their corner, pretending all is okay. When anyone opposes them, they come out with all kinds of intelligent criticism. High-octane stuff like “Stupid”, “bigot”, “hate speech” and that quaint made-up word, “homophobic”. No actual criticism, just words. Against such brilliant intelligence and rapier-like wit, I have no defense.
Well, in the midst of my angst (because gays don’t like me), I bring you some stuff gays hate to be made public. Why? Because I don’t suffer fools gladlyâÂ?¦ and there are now an awful lot of them out there, which I find queer. For all I know they might be ready to throw the worst critical denunciation at me for itâÂ?¦maybe even “fool”, or “shut up”.
“According to fascists, the decisions (of men) are dangerous for the survival of the species. Their range of choices therefore needs to be controlled, restricted, destroyed. They must be manipulated and dominatedâÂ?¦ you’ll note that through some strange psychotic transfer, fascists do not (think of themselves as bad), but that ‘others are bad’. Fascism starts with self-hatred that is always (projected onto) others.” (Eric Coates, who translated ‘Men are good. Period’ from the French. It is an accurate portrayal of gay activity and characteristics).
“(We must make homosexuality acceptable) by using a carefully planned and calculated public relations propaganda campaign.” But, “the critical thing is not to let the public know how it is to be done.” The aim is to “reshape American law and society” and then “the rest of Western culture.” And “First you get the foot in the door, by being as similar as possible; then, and only thenâÂ?¦can you start to drag in your other peculiarities, one by one.” And if anyone complains “demonize them!” “Identifying homosexual behavior as a choice must clearly be avoided, as this would open a can of wormsâÂ?¦” (Kirk and Madsen, gays who wrote the ‘gay agenda’ in ‘After the Ball’).
They also admit to making their claims to ‘rights’ a deliberately false ploy to get their own way: “Our campaign should not demand explicit support for homosexual practices, but should instead take anti-discrimination as its theme.”
It is they who call it a ‘propaganda campaign’, one that would “normalize homosexualityâÂ?¦ as an acceptable lifestyle, through planned brainwashing on a massive scaleâÂ?¦ This invasive ‘marketing’ strategy describes tactics to use the media, to desensitize, to jam and ridicule opposition, to make gays appear victims and to seek high-profile media, political and legal office.”
See how gays deceive you? The quotes again came from Kirk and Madsen. In their book they openly and defiantly proclaim the ‘gay agenda’, which would use propaganda, manipulation of leaders and demonization of anyone who opposed them. This same book launched the current maniacal gay movement and shows us the fascist nature of activists.
“Homosexuality is not normal. On the contrary, it is a challenge to the norm. Nature exists whether academics like it or not. And in nature procreation is the single relentless rule. That is the norm. Our sexual bodies were designed for reproduction. No-one is born gay! The idea is ridiculous. Homosexuality is an adaptation, not an inborn trait.”
What a terrible thing to say! How dare I put it into this paper! He or she should be strung up for it! Okay, but guess who said it? Give up? The person who said it wasâÂ?¦ a lesbian leader! You’ll find it in ‘Vamps and Tramps’ by Camille Paglia, 1994. Pages 70-72.
Simon LeVay (a debunked gay researcher) said “people who think that gays and lesbians are born that way, are also more likely to support gay rights.” So, of course, gays have tried to cover the fact that homosexuality is just an immoral perversion, by instead fighting for their so-called ‘rights’ (which do not exist). Behind it is the vital fact that being gay is a choice, and not inborn. Without this inborn idea, gay ‘rights’ would vanish, and they know itâÂ?¦ which is why they oppose Christians with everything they’ve got.
That is why they target the, er, ‘intelligent’ fringe, our leaders who think they have got it all sorted out in their heads! Kirk and Madsen also said “The ambivalent skeptics are our most promising target. If we can win them overâÂ?¦ the intransigents will eventually be silenced by both law and polite society.”
Well, if you are a pro-gay reader who thinks he is intelligentâÂ?¦ what’s it like to learn what has happened to you? That you have been brainwashed by propaganda because you were an ambivalent skeptic? That you have been manipulated so that gays can dupe you, and society through you? What’s it like to be a gay puppet?
“Kirk and Madsen further emphasized the need to cover up male promiscuity and the predation toward youth and boys, and promote a picture of ‘faultless victims of bigotry’.” The same two actually admit that AIDS originated within the gay ‘community’, but that it “could be used to advantageâÂ?¦to present the homosexual community not so much as high-risk, but as a victimized minorityâÂ?¦ deserving of special protection and care.”
In this we find the strongest of fascist techniques, lies and deceptions, used to fool those who honestly think they are ‘intelligent’. Or just gay puppets. Okay, try the next quote:
“There has been no convincing research that suggests there is an hormonal componentâÂ?¦ in sexual orientation. There’s also nothing we know of that suggests there’s a genetic component. As psychologists, we’re more persuaded that behavior patterns are learned, rather than influenced by genes.” And “To say that my sexual responses at some level are learned, is also to say that I am responsible for them.”
After you have stopped spluttering, you will say “How dare those bigots and homophobes suggest such a thing!” Oops, I forgot to say those quotes were made by a gay leader with pedastry leanings, Ralph Underwager.
“âÂ?¦ the homosexual activist’s primary aim remains elementary school children and youthsâÂ?¦ If gay liberation is to be embraced, how soon shall pedastry be reinstated and pedophilia normalized?… There remains a growing a segment of the gay community that makes no secret of their interest in youth.”
Hah! You’re not caught this time, eh? That’s right, that quote comes from the ‘Homosexual Activist Agenda: Abridged Summary’. Messing about with our kids is, of course, still a non-no for most of society. That’s why gays keep this part of their intentions under cover until the ‘intelligent’ pro-gays are wrapped around their little fingers. Thus, “David Thorsted (NAMBLA) sees the need to down-play pedophilia, to ‘sanitise the homosexual image’ and facilitate acceptance.” Remember pro-gay – it is YOU who are responsible for this terrible state of affairs. By allowing yourself to be deceived and used like a puppet, you are bringing about the abuse of children.
“Academic and scientific studies confirm a strong bias toward pedophilia from men identifying as homosexual.” (Albatrus.com). And a “Disproportionately high number of homosexually orientated men are directly involved (in criminal acts of pedophilia): 6 – 20 times greater than for heterosexual males.” Well, what a big surprise!
Strangely, ‘intelligent’ leaders insist homosexuals will make great foster and adoptive parents! Despite their pedophile desires, gays are being handed kids on a plate. Yes, that really is very intelligent!
“Homosexual development notably does not result in androphilia but in homosexual pedophilia.” (‘The Proportions of Heterosexual & Homosexual Pedophiles Among Sex Offenders Against Children’, Freund & Watson. 1992). The same researchers also found that “around 80% of the victims of pedophilia are boys molested by adult malesâÂ?¦ andâÂ?¦ although most gay men are not pedophiles, 35% of pedophiles are homosexualâÂ?¦” (‘Pedophilia & Heterosexuality vs Homosexuality’, J. Sex Mar. Ther. 1992). That is, over one third of pedophile sex crimes are committed by less than 1% of the sexual population!
“Homosexuals claim that heterosexuals molest most children, but statistics show that homosexuals molest at far higher rates than do heterosexuals. (Some studies put this figure at 18 times more likely!)” (Page 124, Fascism Revisited).
A huge number of references tell us homosexuals are responsible for most pedophile crimes. Now, isn’t that comforting? The Journal of Child Psychiatry believes the actual figures are very much higher, because of under-reporting of the crimes. Let us all rally around our gay friends and applaud their ‘community’ for being so kind to our children!
“Homosexual pedophiles are seriously disturbed men who have given themselves over to evil.” (Quoted in both The Universe, and dwightlongenecker.com). As vast numbers of homosexuals are pedophile- leaning, why does society put up with homosexuality at all? Maybe one of their ‘intelligent’ friends can explain. (No, I don’t mean by simply saying it is untrue! We have all the official figures to hand. Try another excuse!).
Well, that is enough for gays to ponder over for now. They must now tear their hair out and immediately write their compulsory but ridiculous indictment of the truth. Whilst they put their thoughts (?) to paper, let them also understand that most of society hate what they do: “That word – homophobia – has always seemed a misnomer. Many people don’t fear the gay culture; they simply and unapologetically hate it. The idea of same-sex sex gives them the creeps.” (U.S. journalist quoted in ‘Fascism Revisited’).
I remember way back in the 1970’s debating with a Freudian consultant psychiatrist colleague in a packed case study meeting. He told me “Ah, but your disgust for homosexuality is merely your own fear of homosexual feelings within yourself!” Maybe I shouldn’t have done it, but I laughed in his face and said “Come off it! What a stupid thing to say! Now you’ve said it, give me actual proof!” He had to back-down in front of all our colleagues, because he knew it was just gay propaganda without substance.
Yet, thirty years on, there are still people out there who reel out the same old mindless taunt! Oh wellâÂ?¦ at least they are ‘intelligent’ (excuse my splutter). The trouble is, they have no idea what proper research methodology is, so they use stupid phrases. So, it’s not their fault, eh?
